Journal Entry: I’m Not That Important
I discovered a new pictograph today that I had not seen before. It was very faded but the daubs of colorful pigments, carefully drawn, were still evident. It was obvious that considerable time, skill, and thought went into the drawing, the materials, and the location. This style of painting is generally associated with what people of our time named “pre-Columbian Indians of the Fremont culture”. Some are estimated to be between 1,500-4,000 years old, some were dated back as far as 7,000 years and yet more evidence suggests a culture dating back 10,000 years or more. In all likelihood, I will never know a thing about the individual who created this painting. Our best efforts can’t even reliably narrow his or her life time to within three thousand years. And yet, their work is right here, faded yet still beautiful, still inspiring, still impressive.
Other than putting our 234-year-old fetus of a nation in proper perspective, one has to wonder what will remain of us thousands of years from now and, if humans are not yet extinct by then, what meaning will they draw from it in the absence of any or all knowledge of who we were.
Granted, our lifetimes are but a fleeting instance in the vastness of time, our memory barely sufficient to reach back to our own childhoods, and our capacity for knowledge doesn’t even extend to fully grasp our own existence, let alone relate to the thoughts and motivations of one who stood and painted on this very spot thousands of years ago (an amazing thought in itself to contemplate). And yet, what do we even know about artists of our own time? of Picasso? of Michelangelo? of Cezanne? No, not their work, the persons. What were their days like? Who were their friends? Where did they dine? What unrequited loves and desires plagued their lives? What made them laugh? What memories did they carry of their childhoods? And, of what little we do know, how much will remain decades and millenia from now?
Shreds still remain of lives long gone but the people, for all their greatness in their day, are doomed to fade. With every passing moment less is remembered, less is asked, less is known, less is knowable. What remains is the legacy — the art.
A work of art, like a child, nourishes off its progenitor until acquiring an existence of its own and setting out to claim its rightful place in the universe — a place that may yet prove more important than that of the one who created it. If an artist is so lucky, their name may remain associated with their work for some time, but not much more. This is not a bad thing. Who doesn’t wish for their offspring to prosper and attain greatness in their own right?
I think of this as I ponder what it takes to garner recognition as an artist these days. As humanity continues to become more concerned with fashion and profit, more detached from the forces that sustain it, less spiritual, less curious, less aware of anything outside itself; the artist no longer has an inherent rightful place. Making the time to create, let alone earning a living in art becomes ever more challenging. Self promotion is valued above the very things being promoted.
What are the implications for us misfits not comfortable in the public eye, not interested in celebrity, not willing to make our personal lives a matter of public record? With the din of marketing ringing ever louder, more incessant, more invasive; a massive cacophonous chorus where each member belches their own tune and demands an audience, at times for no other reason than they have access to the stage. How does one reconcile the blissful solitary reverence that yields their most meaningful work with the need to be a loud, repetitive, backslapping, joke-cracking, too-cool-for-school, exhibitionist cheerleader? Is there still room in this world for the introvert? for the thinker? for the humble? for complexity and deeper meaning?
For myself, I want my work to become greater and more meaningful than my own life. I want my own indiscretions, imperfections, and mundane worries to be long forgotten and beyond the reach of knowing when my work is considered long after my time, and indeed that it may even be considered at all. I hope my art will stand on its own and be able to present to new eyes the things I came to know and feel and care about in a world and a time that may be altogether alien to them. The rest is of no importance beyond today.
Ironically, the most profound truths I came to learn are anchored in humility. I would never have experienced true awe, true discovery, and true beauty, had I not come to realize and admit my own insignificance in the grand scheme of things. Without acknowledging my own unimportance, I could never have created anything important in the first place.
What art will survive our times? Will it have the power to inspire one who randomly stumbled upon it in the desert 10,000 years from now with no knowledge of who we were, when we lived, and why we did what we did?
Category: Uncategorized







Amazing pictograph you stumbled upon. Such things always get me thinking.
A great read as usual.
Will there be a leftover pc or mac plugged in to allow us to be seen 5000 years from now? Is our own modernization going to be the demise of our own civilization? I feel like the United States has less and less culture and unity the longer we are a country.
Just this morning as I was cleaning up the breakfast dishes I thought of some of the festivals that occur in countries like India, Japan, Africa. These are events that hundreds of thousands of people come to. People walk for days, weeks, and months to get there. To my knowledge there is no such thing here.
Petroglyphs have such staying power, and there is no protection, no backups, no armed guards, usually not even a velvet rope. Without heading out to a piece of sandstone or maybe even some tree bark there isn’t much hope that our creations will be here thousands of years from now.
So true. I love your writing Guy!
I feel like a broken recording saying “wow” every time I read your blog. Your words so accurately echo my own thoughts and feelings. It is discouraging to try and make a living at art when you don’t want to be that loud, repetitive, backslapping, joke-cracking, too-cool-for-school, exhibitionist cheerleader. I just did an art opening last Friday and they are such painful events for me. I don’t want to be there. I don’t want to flog my work. I don’t want to be the focus of attention. I want my work to speak on my behalf, like the powerful, spiritual images of our ancestors.
Guy, you keep writing this great stuff!
There is so much to say about this subject, and on so many different levels. I could write a lot, but I’ll just drop three quick bits here and move on.
1. My story about time and who I am… Perhaps 10 years ago I was in Death Valley at the Mesquite Springs campground. I won’t tell the who story but it had been a crazy two days. In the morning I wandered across the wash and up the small bluff on the other side and found a rock to sit on quietly for a few moments and just take in the vast space in this area. I looked down and saw an oddly shaped rock on the ground. I picked it up and quickly realized its shape had been produced by human hands, those of much earlier residents who fashioned rocks into this shape to use as knives, residents who had certainly had full and rich lives around this spring and in the valley, lives that were almost fully beyond my comprehension but which suddenly became palpably real to me as I held the rock for perhaps ten minutes. I replaced to rock where I found it and wandered back to camp, changed.
2. In some sense a bit of the artist as a person is contained in whatever bit of his/her work survives. In the same way that I imagine that I can be inside of that early Death Valley person’s mind just a bit after holding the stone that he or she carved, when I really confront (not just superficially “look at”) the creation of another person I am confronting the way they viewed the world and the way they thought. (Which is most certainly not to say that I can understand them completely.) I first understood this in music, where the literal thought processes of the composer are captured in the composition, but it can be as true with a photograph.
3. I don’t know what to say about the “self promotion” part of art that you mention, except to first acknowledge that it exists and that it makes many of us very uncomfortable, especially in those cases in which it is hard to see that there is a whole lot there to promote. I won’t cite examples or go into details – I’m sure you can think of your own. On the other hand, I think an artist has to have a certain confidence that what he/she creates is valuable and interesting to others. Finding the right accommodation is a tricky thing.
Thanks,
Dan
Pictographs, Art, Artists, Importance, Pride, Greatness all come and go in a blink of an eye.
It’s all relevant for a moment, or should I say, a simple harmonic motion. The cycle, in the big scheme of things maybe 10,000 years or maybe 500,000 years.
Will your psychic apparatus find contentment during your journey ?
[...] I’m Not That Important. Tagged with: cartoons, Links, mac, Photography [...]