Review: Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L
Before delving into my impressions of Canon’s unique ultra-wide tilt/shift lens, I’d like to take a moment to thank my friends at BorrowLenses.com. I know, some of you may be thinking “oh boy, here comes the sales pitch,” and yes, you are right, but . . . I stay true to my pledge: I only promote and recommend those products and vendors I use personally and find helpful in my own work. The people I worked with at BorrowLenses.com are very much an example of the kind of entrepreneurial small business that deserves recognition in these times. Dealing with real people driven to help and assist is truly refreshing. If you need that special lens for that special assignment or trip, you will not go wrong with these guys, and at the same time you will help support a small American business.
~~~
For quite a few years, my medium of choice was the 4×5 view camera. In the early days of digital SLRs, I treated them with some suspicion; after all they still harbored the same limitations that turned me away from 35mm film in the first place. When the original Canon 1Ds came on the scene and preliminary user reviews raved about image quality, I felt ready to take the plunge. The DSLR was, at first, a companion system to my Wista, but I gradually found myself using it more and more. Image detail was certainly not up to par with 4×5 film scans, but for most professional uses, including fine prints up to a certain size, the convenience and versatility quickly won me over. Today I can say with confidence that there is nothing I miss about film. I do, however, miss the versatility and creative options offered by the view camera’s ability to adjust the lens and image planes for perspective control and depth of focus (collectively known as “movements”).
Over the years I had used Canon’s previous generation of TS-E lenses (24mm, 45mm, and 90mm) and found them to be excellent performers. While not quite allowing the same freedom of movement as view cameras, they do offer a large degree of perspective and focus control to accommodate my needs as a landscape photographer as well as the more demanding needs of architectural photographers. You can imagine my joy when Canon announced not only a new generation of these lenses with some notable improvements to both optics and operations, but also a unique new offering: an ultra-wide angle lens with a wide range of movements.
As with previous reviews, I will not bore you with specifications and lab results. Those can easily be found on other sites. Instead, I wanted to find out how well the lens fits into my style of work, on location, and making the kind of landscape images I pursue.
First impressions are important, and mine was: “this is a big lens!” Seen here next to my 17-40mm f/4L workhorse zoom, the TS-E is a beast. This is for a good reason. In order to allow movements, the lens needs to project an image circle much larger than the sensor. While the zoom lens only needs to accommodate a usable diameter of 36mm to cover a full-frame sensor, the TS-E requires a much larger one. To do so, it needs to gather a lot of light, which is achieved using a large front element that protrudes prominently from the lens barrel. The downside to this design, however, is that it does not allow the use of filters.
You may be wondering why a 17mm lens, which already offers excellent depth of field when stopped down, might benefit from movements. The answer is perspective control. When your subject and camera are not perfectly parallel, the image becomes distorted. Parallel lines tilt, horizons bend, etc., and the effect is greatly exaggerated with wide lenses. The ability to shift the lens plane allows for both correction as well as intentional creative distortion not possible when the lens plane is held parallel to the sensor.
I’ll share with you another useful tidbit: depth of field is exactly the same between tilt/shift lenses and fixed ones. The difference is that with a fixed lens, depth of field is measured in front of and behind the plane of focus. The ability to tilt the lens allows you to position this plane such that depth of field applies above and below it. This allows using larger apertures than would be required using a fixed lens while still keeping important elements within sharp focus.
Operating a tilt/shift lens takes some practice. Focus is done manually and requires an understanding of the Scheimpflug principle, illustrated below. Essentially, the Scheimpflug principle states that optimal focus is achieved when the lens plane, the image (sensor) plane, and the subject (focus) plane all converge at the same point, as illustrated below (this is explained further in my Creative Landscape Photography eBook).
But enough theory. Let’s see how this optical marvel does in the real world. And the real world for me is out in the wilds of the Colorado Plateau. After a fun night of camping, I woke up before dawn and scrambled to a favorite spot. This scene presented a double challenge: a near-far composition where I wanted to keep the sandstone patterns at my feet as well as the distant cliffs in sharp focus, as well as the tree, which in this example was quite a way below the plane of focus. For the former, the TS-E lens allowed tilting the plane of focus, and for the latter, I had to stop down to f/16. At this setting, my 17-40 zoom is starting to show softness due to diffraction.
The lens performed admirably! Not only did the tilt provide sufficient range for near-far focus, but the resulting images were wonderfully sharp and remarkably free of chromatic aberration (aka “fringing”), the lack of which is an indication of very well-corrected optics, capable of focusing all colors accurately at the same point.
Next, I wanted to push the lens to the extreme: full tilt and full shift. Here, I was able to hit the limits of its image circle, resulting in a dark band at the top of the frame. This is something to watch out for with these type of lenses.
In addition to creative control of perspective and depth, the ability to shift the lens also allows capturing multiple frames, which can later be stitched into a larger file with great accuracy. Moreover, tilting the lens when combined with a large aperture can be used to create interesting blur effects, separating a sharp subject from its surroundings. In short, this is a wonderful tool for creative photographers.
Still, my sense is that the 17mm TS-E is really best suited for architectural photography where its unique combination of wide angle-of-view and perspective correction are truly a boon. For landscape work, I still prefer Canon’s 24mm TS-E, which, while not as wide, seems to fit better with my compositional style, as well as offers the advantage of allowing the use of filters.
If, however, you’re a fan of ultra-wide compositions and were previously disappointed with Canon’s other offerings in this focal length, this may be the lens for you.
And hey, if you’re not certain, give my friends at BorrowLenses.com a call and give it a try!
Category: Product Recommendations, Reviews










Interesting lens, but it will take a lot more than this to get me to give up my 4×5.
Out of interest, did you work out at what point the tilt is rotating around? I can’t work out if it’s the equivalent of front tilt or back tilt, etc.. Did you notice the framing changing when you applied tilt?
Thanks guys!
Robert, I haven’t given up my 4×5, either. I do hope to get a digital back for it one of these days, though.
Tim, it acts more like front tilt, although with some creative use of the tripod head, the back (camera) can be tilted and the lens’ controls can be used to compensate. The range of motion is not nearly as generous as it would be with a view camera, though, so the effect on framing is not as dramatic. To me the real strength of these lenses is actually not in their ability to tilt/swing the plane of focus but, rather, perspective control, especially considering the distortion introduced by the wide lenses. For perfect front-to-back focus, I still feel that focus stacking (multiple exposures focused incrementally) offers more flexibility. This technique combines real image detail from each frame to produce the final frame. Distortion correction, on the other hand, is best done in-camera since software will always need to manufacture data to achieve it post-exposure.
PERFECT TIMING! Only recently I’ve begun thinking about buying either the 24 or 17, so this was nice to see.
I was a bit surprised that you prefered the 24mm. Aside from the filter issue, don’t you think that the wide angle is much more useful for landscapes? I guess I was hoping you could elaborate more on your preference, since I’m looking at picking up one of those lenses myself, but can’t afford both.
Guy,
You are correct…This lens is perfect for architecture photography as is the new 24mm. Some of our friends like Darwin Wiggett shoot it as a landscape lens, but for me it perfectly straightens the lines of a structure that occur when using a non-TS lens, and it is one of the sharpest lenses in the current Canon line up…all the more reason to give it a try.
Jay
Kory, this is more a personal preference. I find that 24mm works better for me in more situations than wider focal lengths.
If you prefer extreme wide angles, the 17mm may well be a better choice for you but in my opinion you will not benefit as much from the movements unless you also photograph architecture and need perspective control. At 17mm on a full frame camera at f/16, your DOF spans from 1ft to infinity.
Guy
Awesome Guy…
Well understood!!
Guy, thanks. It’s not really the DOF that I’m after, but the perspective control. Being able to correct things like leaning trees would definitely be a benefit in landscape photography at wider angles. But, it seems like what you’re saying it that it doesn’t come into play often enough to warrant buying the lens. If my assesment is incorrect, please let me know.
I’d love to own a copy of this lens. However, after taking a hard look at the frequency of my 17mm compositions, I also chose the 24mm TS-E II. I’m certain that I would use it and love it, but not enough to justify the cost. I actually prefer stitching 24mm TS-E images if I need a wider FOV.
Great information. I’ve been debating purchasing a tilt/shift in recent months so I appreciate your insight. Thanks again, John
Guy,
I recently rented one from Adorama for some interior shots of small apartments in NYC. It turned out to be an excellent tool for shooting vertical and panning horizontally to capture the entire width of the room without having to rotate the camera and cope with the scalloped edges produced while stitching.
As long as there are so many convenient sources for rentals, I believe that photographers can choose the perfect lens for each job and not have to agonize over the (exceptionally [high]) cost of ownership.
Thanks for suggesting this tool to us.
Richard